<$BlogRSDURL$>

Thursday, May 19, 2005

Fundraising Hypocrisy in the Sunshine State

You probably wouldn't take it too well if your neighbor came over to your house and started telling you what you and your family should have for dinner. It's your house - you and your family can decide without outside interference.

Yet, outside interference is the name of the game this week, as Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger travels to Florida, Illinois, and Texas for a series of fundraisers for his 2005 ballot initiative agenda. In prominent attendance at the Florida fundraisers will be Governor Jeb Bush and members of the Florida Chamber of Commerce, who are working together to roll back the ballot initiative process in Florida.

The efforts to curtail the initiative process in Florida, led by the state Chamber of Commerce and supported by Governor Bush, have focused on the ability of out-of-state interests to corrupt the process with well-financed campaigns. Schwarzenegger has held fundraisers around the country seeking money for his ballot campaign, collecting millions from out-of-state interests to fund his ballot agenda.

Schwarzenegger has been campaigning for independent commissions to draw legislative and congressional districts; Bush does not support the drive for an independent redistricting commission in Florida.

These guys are each half-right: Bush is right that out-of-state interests have no place spending money to influence California’s initiative process, which should belong to the people of California. Schwarzenegger is right that an independent redistricting commission would allow voters in California and Florida to pick their elected officials, not the other way around.

But while these guys are getting what they want, the rest of us in California and Florida are left with an initiative process dominated by money and a system of drawing districts rigged to meet the needs of politicians, not voters.

Check out more information on the Florida/California fundraising hypocrisy or see our press release.

Links to this post (0) comments
Some California local campaign finance contribution limits

Jeffrey Walter, and attorny for the city council of Martinez, CA compiled this list of contribution limits for some California cities as of May 19, 2005. I'm posting it as a reference to those who may be interested, but I haven't double checked these myself.


1. San Jose: $100/person for primary election; $100/person for general election; $250/person for mayoral primary election; $250/person for mayoral general election.

2. Anaheim: $1,000/person per election cycle.

3. Thousand
Oaks: $250/person per election cycle.

4. Walnut
Creek: $100/per person per election cycle (adjusted by CPI).

5. Santa
Clara: $250/per person per election cycle.

6. Laguna
Beach: $250/per person per election cycle.

7. Cupertino: $100/per person per election cycle.

8. Huntington
Beach: $300/per person per election cycle.

9. Vista: $300/per person per election cycle.

10. Escondido: $250/per person per election cycle.

11. Concord: $1,000/per person per election cycle.

12. Oakland: $100/per person (but $500/per person if voluntary expenditure ceilings are adopted).

13. Petaluma: $500/per person per 2-year election cycle (as of July 7, 2003).

Links to this post (0) comments

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?