Wednesday, February 15, 2006
As Mary Flood reports in the Houston Chronicle, the prosecution has called its second witness, former head of Enron Broadband Services Ken Rice.
Rice, a protege of sorts of former CEO Jeffrey Skilling, told the jury that he lied ("misled") investors about the financial health of Enron's internet business as a result of pressure from Skilling. Rice made repeated assertions that the broadband part of Enron's business was expanding, even though it was earning no revenues and was laying off employees.
The up-is-down mentality was part of the "pressure-cooker" atmosphere at Enron to meet or beat Wall Street's earnings estimates for the company and to avoid the perception that the company was just a plain old trading company making high-risk investments.
Rice also testified on an issue central to the defense's general contention that the problems of Enron were caused by wacky Andy Fastow's unknown self-dealing with his Raptors (companies Enron used to transfer debt off its books, making it appear much more profitable than its true financial state.) Rice testified that Skilling not only knew about the Raptors, but encouraged their use for off-loading debt from Enron's books.
Two different pictures of Enron's financial health portrayed in meetings in March 2001 epitomize the way Enron played ball. After fudging the numbers twice in 2000 to meet earnings estimates, Rice told Skilling they would have to revise their 2001 projections for Wall Street. At a meeting of Ernon Broadband Services employees on March 15, 2001, Skilling told employees: "It's bad."
Eight days later, on a conference call with analysts, Rice and Skilling reported that EBS had a great quarter, weren't laying anyone off, and were growing dramatically.
The prosecution played a video of the March 15 meeting.
More as it comes.
As the AP's Jennifer Bundy reports in the Huntington Herald-Dispatch, on Monday, the West Virginia Senate Judiciary Committee voted 7-5 to approve SB124, a bill providing public financing for qualifying legislative candidates. Senator Andy McKenzie called the proposal "un-American".
Paging Roy Cohn, paging Roy Cohn.
-to qualify, candidates for single-member districts in the House must raise 100 contributions of $5; candidates for multi-member House districts must raise from 125-250 contributions, depending on the number of members in the district; candidates for senate must raise 250 (except in two districts).
-qualifying single-member House district candidates with an opponent would receive $7,500 in public funding for the primary and $7,500 for the general; qualifying Senate candidates with an opponent would receive $20,000 for each.
-funding for single-member House district candidates would be available in 2010; for other candidates in 2012.
The AP story says qualifying contributions are $10, but the bill as listed on the WV leg website says $5. West Virginia's use of varying-membered multi-member districts makes a simple recitation of the details more difficult. You can get all the particulars by clicking the link above.
Next up for the bill: the Senate Finance Committee.
If the bill makes it through, West Virginia would become the second state legislature after Connecticut to pass a system of voluntary full public financing of elections for itself. Arizona and Maine have passed public financing by ballot measure.