Wednesday, August 11, 2004

A Good Effort - Sort of

Defenders of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), aka the McCain-Feingold Act, are taking to the courts and airwaves to defend against a lawsuit filed by Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (WRTL) testing the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Act. WRTL wants to use corporate money to run so-called issue ads in the weeks running up to the election . . . issue ads which just happen to mention candidates, of course.

McCain-Feingold disallows corporate money for ads that mention candidates in the period just prior to elections ("electioneering ads"), a prohibition upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in McConnell v. FEC. In essence then, WRTL's case is a sham, likely filed more for the free publicity (and it's getting tons) than as a sincere constitutional challenge. Whether you agree with the Supreme Court's decision, the point in contention has already been decided . . . only a year ago.

Before you go worryin' about WRTL's First Amendment rights being trampled on, the group can still run ads mentioning candidates in the weeks before an election - they just have to be paid for with donations from individuals, subject to the $5000 limit. Or WRTL can use its corporate money to run electioneering ads in newspapers or direct mailings or online. Anyone out there read a newspaper, live at an address, or have an e-mail address? Right. WRTL has plenty of opportunity to exercise its First Amendment rights. The fear-mongers' portrayal of WRTL as the helpless maiden bound and gagged on the railroad tracks before the evil train of McCain-Feingold just doesn't fly.

All that being said, BCRA still was a mistake in some ways. It raised the amount an individual can give a candidate from $1,000 to $2,000, when the great majority of Americans can't afford to give even a quarter of the old limit. And that's two grand for the primary and two grand for the general, meaning a wealthy couple can give eight grand to a candidate for a given election. When's the last time you had eight thousand bucks to give a politician? Individuals can also contribute $5,000 to a PAC, meaning WRTL can run $1,000,000 worth of ads explicitly saying VOTE AGAINST FEINGOLD with donations from a mere 200 people. As you can imagine, a million bucks can buy quite a bit of airtime.

All these limits are sky-high for average Americans. These limits still allow the few to dominate the selection and election of candidates - the core of any democracy - as well as the airwaves which nearly all of us use to stay informed about our world. When the WRTL case gets dismissed, there will still be a lot of work to be done before the American people reclaim our democracy from the hands of wealthy interests.

Links to this post (0) comments

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?